УДК 304.44
SOCIAL REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE CITY OF KRASNOYARSK
Polina V. Shatrova1, Maria A. Kolesnik2
Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
1 orcid.org/0000-0002-9251-1208, shatrovap@mail.ru
2 orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-7869, masha_kolesnik@mail.ru
Abstract. This article presents the results of a study of social representation of Krasnoyarsk residents about the right-bank of the city using the go-along method and content analysis. The study involved residents of Krasnoyarsk who live in the right-bank districts (Sverdlovskiy district, Kirovskiy district), as well as residents of the city who live in the left-bank areas of the city (Tsentralniy district, Zheleznodorozhniy district, Oktyabrsky district). To get information about the views of residents on the right Bank of the city of Krasnoyarsk, a deep and semi-formal type of interview was used. It was found that the most favorable areas for living in Krasnoyarsk are considered to be the Kirovskiy district (prospect named after the newspaper «Krasnoyarskiy rabochiy», Vavilova street), the Sverdlovskiy district (residential complex «Yuzhnyy bereg», residential complex «Belye rosy», the area of Gladkovа street). Also identified are the disadvantaged areas of the right Bank of Krasnoyarsk: Leninsky district, Kirovsky district in the area of Shchorsa street, Sverdlovskiy district in the area of Semafornaya and Sverdlovskaya streets. Using content analysis, the structure of social representations, consisting of such components as information, the representation field, and installation, is studied. It is revealed that the following categories are most actively represented in interviews: «material environment of the city» and «natural environment of the city». In the course of the analysis of the «field of representations» component, it was revealed that the core of social representations of urban space are the most significant cultural spaces and objects for the majority of citizens, and embankments are important in the urban environment. Residents of Krasnoyarsk are concerned about the unsightly appearance and monotony of the architecture of the right Bank, as well as some disadvantages of infrastructure. It is also revealed that there is a General positive orientation of the interview.
Keywords: Social representations, the go-along method, social representations of the right-bank of Krasnoyarsk
For citation: Шатрова, П. В. Социальные представления о городе Красноярске / П. В. Шатрова, М. А. Колесник // Социальная антропология Сибири. – 2020. – Т. 1, № 3. – С. 14-25. – DOI 10.31804/2687-0606-2020-1-3-14-25. – EDN KTUANM.
References
1. Abric, J.-Cl. Central system, peripheral system: their functions and roles in the dynamics of social representations // Papers on social representations, 1993, 2, pp. 75-78.
2. Абульханова-Славская, К.А., Гордиенко Е.В. Представления личности об отношении к ней значимых других // Психологический журнал, 2001, 5, с.38-47. EDN: THKJCR
3. Андреева, Г.М. Социальная идентичность: временные и средовые компоненты // Психология личности в трудах отечественных психологов, 2000, с. 344-357.
4. Бовина, И. Б. Теория социальных представлений: история и современное развитие // Социологический журнал, 2010, 3, с. 5-20. EDN: PBDSON
5. Дюркгейм, Э. Социология: ее предмет, метод, предназначение. Москва: Канон, 1995, 352 с.
6. Kusenbach, M. Street phenomenology: the go-along as ethnographic research tool // Ethnography, 2003, 4-4, pp.455-485.
7. Ларина, Т.И. Ильина, А.А. Реконструкция социальных представлений о городе: опыт использования метода go-along // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 2016, 3. – с. 20-32. EDN: YFOSJJ
8. Moscovici, S. On Social representations. Social cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding. Ed. by H.J. Forgas. L., 1981, 182 p.
9. Рубинштейн, С.Л. Человек и мир. Москва: Наука, 1998, 224 с.
10. Семёнова, А.В. Контент-анализ в социологии: методологические новации // Философия и социология, 2011, с.11-15.