УДК 004.9:330
POSSIBILITIES OF BIM (BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING)- TECHNOLOGIES FOR INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT
Natalya P. Koptseva1
1Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
decanka@mail.ru, orcid.org/0000-0003-3910-7991
Abstract. The Russian Federation started implementation and diffusion of BIM-technologies in construction industry. However, modern BIM-technologies are not the industry-specific innovation. The necessary condition for their effective implementation is, at the least, implementation and diffusion of organizational and inter-organizational innovations, and, at the most, social (“non-technological”) innovations, due to the fact that the basis for BIM is integrated joint standardized interdisciplinary work. Otherwise, investing into BIM-technologies will not only fail to produce the desirable effects, but will also cause yet another rejection of technological modernization (in the context of the arguments of criticism of “Californian Ideology”) in Russia. Asian countries (India, South Korea, China), despite proclaiming the speedy implementation of BIM-technologies, start with extensive research of technical and socio- cultural premises. We propose using the model of Succar and Kassem, which will allow determining the degree of macro-maturity (readiness) for BIM implementation and diffusion, including the specific conditions of the Russian Federation. The critical analysis of scientific research makes it clear that in order to obtain the desirable effect it is necessary to analyze economic behaviour at three levels: at the individual level, organizational level and country level. To put it mildly, the scientific research of BIM-technologies in Russia is not sufficient enough (1 publication for 25 years) to expect real achievements (perhaps, with the exception of some imitational segments). Strategic necessity for implementation and diffusion of BIM-technologies in Russia doesn’t cancel, but rather involves 1) transformation of organizational culture of all players (stakeholders) on the market of BIM-technologies; 2) the prompt implementation of education and training for BIM-technologies both in technical and social sciences; 3) regular informing stakeholders and general public about the technical and socio-cultural effect of implementation and diffusion of BIM-technologies; 4) establishing scientific research centres, aimed at learning to master scientific methods of research of BIM- technologies and creating the system of comprehensive monitoring on the basis of leading national universities.
Keywords: technological modernization, BIM-technologies, innovations, readiness for implementation.
For citatinon: Копцева Н. П. Возможности BIM (Building Information Modeling)-технологий для инновационного развития // Цифровизация. 2021. № 2. С. 8–24. DOI: 10.37993/2712-8733-2021-2-2-8-24
References
1. Amarnath C. B. Global Trends in BIM-research, 2016. URL: http://www.bimthinkspace.com/2016/09/global-trends-in-bim-research.html. Accessed January 14, 2017.
2. Barbrook R. Cyber-communism: how the Americans are superseding capitalism in cyberspace // Science as Culture. 2000. V. 9. № 1. Pp. 5-40.
3. Barbrook R. Imaginary futures: from thinking machines to the global village. UK: Pluto Press, 2007.
4. Barbrook R., Cameron A. The Californian Ideology // Science as Culture. 1996. V. 6. № 1. Pp. 44-72.
5. Eastman C., Teicholz P., Sacks R., Liston K. BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers and contractors. USA: John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
6. Gallaher M. P., O’Connor Al. C., Dettbarn J. L., Gilday L. T. Cost Analysis of Inadequate Interoperability in the U.S. Capital Facilities Industry. USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2004.
7. Geroski P. A. Models of technology diffusion // Research policy. 2000. V. 29. № 4. Pp. 603-625.
8. Kale S., Arditi D. Innovation diffusion modeling in the construction industry // Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2009. V. 136. № 3. Pp. 329-340.
9. Korol M. Tak chto ghe daet nam BIM? (So what will we BIM)? // Stroitelstvo. 2016. № 5. Pp. 38-40.
10. Kurzweil R. Human life: the next generation // New Scientist. 2005. № 24. Pp. 32-7.
11. Lee K., Park Y. H., Lee G., Jung W., Lee S., Lee H. An Introduction to South Korea’s BIM Knowledge Base Development Project. 2015. URL: http://www.iaarc.org/publications/fulltext/FFACE-ISARC15-3024536.pdf Accessed January 14, 2017.
12. Leonard A. The Cybercommunist Manifesto. 1999. URL: http://www. salon. com/tech/log/1999/09/10/cybercommunism/index. Accessed January 14, 2017.
13. Mizruchi M. S., Fein L. C. The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism // Administrative science quarterly. 1999. V. 44. № 4. Pp. 653-683. EDN: DDGUVL
14. Otsenka primeneniy BIM-tekhnologiy v stroitelstve. Rezultaty issledovaniya effektivnosti primeneniya BIM-tekhnologiy v investitsionno-stroitelnykh proektakh rossiyskikh kompanij. Otchet (Evaluation of applications BIM-technologies in construction. (The results of the study the effectiveness of BIM-technology investment and construction projects of Russian companies. Report). URL: http://www.nopriz.ru/upload/iblock/2cc/4.7_bim_rf_otchot.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2017.
15. Ouellet M. Cybernetic Capitalism and the Global Information Society // Cultural political economy. 2010. Pp. 177-196.
16. Primenenie BIM-tekhnologij na stroitelstvo po goszakazu moghet stat obyazatelnym. (The use of BIM-technology to build on the state order may become mandatory. 2016. URL: http://www.minstroyrf.ru/press/primenenie-bim-tekhnologiy-na-stroitelstvo-po-goszakazu-mozhet-stat-obyazatelnym-v-2019-godu/. Accessed January 14, 2017.
17. Rogers E. M. Diffusion of innovation theory. New York, USA: Free Press, 1995.
18. Sawhney A. State of BIM adoption and outlook in India. 2014. URL: http://ricssbe.org/RICSINDIA/media/rics/News/RICS-SBE-Research_State-of-BIM-Adoption.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2017.
19. See R. Building Information Models and Model Views. 2007. URL: http://www.pinnaclecad.com/pin-pdf/Building-Information-Models-and-Model-Views.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2017.
20. Stoneman P., Diederen P. Technology diffusion and public policy // The Economic Journal. 1994. V. 104. № 425. Pp. 918-930.
21. Succar B. Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders // Automation in construction. 2009 (a). V. 18. № 3. Pp. 357-375.
22. Succar B. Building information modelling maturity matrix. Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies, IGI Global, 2009 (b). Pp.65-103.
23. Succar B. The five components of BIM performance measurement. 2010. URL: http://www.hetnationaalbimplatform.nl/files/pages/the-five-components-of-bim-performance-measurement.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2017.
24. Succar B., Kassem M. Macro-BIM adoption: Conceptual structures // Automation in Construction. 2015. № 57. Pp. 64-79.
25. Taylor J. E., Levitt R. E. Inter-organizational knowledge flow and innovation diffusion in project-based industries. 2005. URL: http://cife.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/WP089.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2017.
26. Trachtenberg A. D. “Kalifornijskaya ideologiya” b zdravookhranenie: fenomen telemeditsiny (“The Californian Ideology” and health care: telemedicine phenomenon). 2015. URL: http://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/32402/1/klo_2015_249.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2017.
27. Van Nederveen G. A., Tolman F. P. Modelling multiple views on buildings // Automation in Construction. 1992. V. 1. № 3. Pp. 215-24.